Going to a third-party vendor for iPhone screen replacements (or doing the repair yourself) may seem like a great idea. But trust us, it’s not. Despite the fact that it’s probably cheaper, getting your iPhone’s screen replaced by a third-party will instantly void your warranty and might damage your handset if it’s not done properly. […] Read More… iDrop News
Edge computing is hot right now, but not everyone understands why so many people are so focused on keeping their data in gateways or on on-premise services instead of sending it to the cloud. While it may seem like a huge shift to bring processing to the edge of the networks as opposed to sending all of the data to the cloud, for many IoT use cases, the cloud was never going to be a viable solution.
There are five primary reasons why the edge is winning when it comes to the internet of things. Three of them are technical limitations on cloud data transfers and two are dependent on business culture and the perception of cloud security. Let’s cover them.
1. Security – This is one of the favored reasons for big industrial companies. They don’t want to connect their processes to the internet because it exposes their operations to hackers and data breaches. For example, at the Honeywell User Group meeting I attended last year, most of the customers of Honeywell’s industrial automation products were loath to even put wireless infrastructure in their plants for fear of security breaches. Some of this is perception of risk, but thanks to a variety of hacks from Target’s breach — which began in its HVAC system and ended up compromising customers’ credit cards, raising concerns over hackers targeting infrastructure — this is a legitimate fear, given certain types of industrial processes.
2. IP – Related to the issue of security are concerns over proprietary data and intellectual property. High-quality sensors can be used to derive important information, such as a refinery process that counts as a trade secret. Jaganath Rao, SVP of IoT Strategy at Siemens, says that food companies are particularly sensitive to these sorts of issues. Imagine if the recipe for Coke could be inferred through its industrial data, for example.
3. Latency and resiliency – Latency is a measure of how fast information can travel over a network. Whether you are waiting for a Netflix movie to load or playing “Call of Duty,” latency matters. And when you translate digital bits into electrons or machinery, latency matters even more. In the home, for example, cloud-to-cloud services can lead to a second or two of delay when I’m turning on my lights using an app. That’s irritating. But in an industrial process, sending data from a machine to the cloud and then back again can cost a lot of money or even lives.
One of the more popular arguments for edge computing is autonomous cars. The idea is that a car going 60 miles an hour needs to be able to identify a threat and stop the car instantly, not wait a few seconds to make a round trip to the cloud. In the industrial world, a machine that is in danger of failing might only have a few seconds or a minute of warning. A sensor might pick up the new vibration signature that signals a failure and then send that to a local gateway for processing. The gateway needs to have the ability to recognize the failure and either alert someone or send back instructions to shut off the machine within milliseconds or seconds.
This also ties into resiliency. Network coverage can falter and the internet can go down. When that happens, cars, heavy industrial machinery, and manufacturing operations still need to work. Edge computing enables them to do that.
4. Bandwidth costs – Some connected sensors, such as cameras or aggregated sensors working in an engine, produce a lot of data. As in multiple gigabytes of data every hour or, in some cases, every minute. In those cases, sending all of that information to the cloud would take a long time and be prohibitively expensive. That’s why local image processing or using local analytics to detect patterns makes so much sense. Instead of sending terabytes of raw image data from a connected streetlight, a local gateway can process that data and then send the relevant information.
5. Autonomy – The problems of latency and resiliency bring us to the final reason the edge will flourish in the internet of things: autonomous decision-making can’t rely on the cloud. For many, the promise of connected plants or offices is that a large number of processes can become automated. If a machine can monitor itself and the process it’s performing, then it can eventually be programmed to take the right action when problems occur. So for example if a sensor detects a pressure buildup, it can release a valve further down the line to relieve that pressure. But once a process relies on a particular level of automation, it’s imperative that it can rely on that level to be enacted in time and all the time.
Most of these are fairly common sense, but what many in the traditional IT world miss is that when you start moving real-world machinery around instead of just bits, it’s no longer good enough to provide 99.99% reliability or millisecond latency. When challenges in the digital world meet the physical world they are magnified; real people’s lives or production processes are on the line, with real-world consequences.
It’s not to say that the cloud won’t pick up more IoT work over time, but right now, it’s a pretty scary proposition for a lot of IoT use cases.
Latin American startups haven’t had the same valuations as Silicon Valley startups. This frustrates many Latin American entrepreneurs seeking investment, as they don’t understand why Latin American VCs aren’t doing deals at Silicon Valley valuations. There are important reasons why Latin American early-stage investment valuations are lower. For one, there are few acquisitions in Latin America, and when acquisitions do happen, they tend to be at lower valuations than their counterparts in other parts of the world. VCs need to make returns, or they’ll be out of business. Therefore, if exits are lower, the initial price that venture capitalists pay…
Even though it seems like everyone is selling some sort of smart speaker, Bloomberg reports that Facebook will not be the next company joining in and has scuttled plans for a reveal at its F8 developer event. Despite earlier rumors of a device that w… Engadget RSS Feed
During the 1990s — often looked upon as Apple’s wayward years — the company faced steep competition and limited growth in the PC market, and so it decided to try its hand in a wide range of burgeoning markets. Products developed under the guidance of John Sculley — the man who replaced Apple co-founder and […] Read More… iDrop News
The following is a guest contributed post by Ted Annis, the manager and co-founder of Transducing Energy Devices, LLC.
As automakers try to plug into consumers’ future needs, electric cars are stirring boardroom curiosity – but not a lot of sales.
Some car manufacturers are banking on a different story in the future, though.
Electric cars comprise less than 1 percent of U.S. auto sales, yet some major automakers are planning to manufacture many more electric models in the near future. According to an article on Bloomberg.com, General Motors plans to roll out 20 models by 2023 and Toyota 10 by early in the next decade. Researcher LMC Automotive predicts 75 electric models will be produced in the U.S. over the next five years.
“The 21st century will see the return of electric cars, as we are witnessing with Tesla, Porsche, GM, Ford, and others,” says Ted Annis, manager and co-founder of Transducing Energy Devices, LLC (www.tedmagnetics.com) in Ann Arbor, Mich. “Environmental, economical and market factors will meet to make the electric car prominent in the American culture.”
LMC forecasts gasoline-powered engines will still make up about 85 percent of U.S. new car sales in 2025, but that electric cars’ market share will continue to accelerate. Bloomsberg New Energy Finance’s Electric Vehicle Outlook 2017 projects electric cars will comprise over 50 percent in sales of new light-duty vehicles by 2035.
Annis gives four advantages of an electric car that will increase its popularity:
Fuel cost savings. Electric cars are entirely charged by the electricity you provide, meaning you don’t need to buy any gas ever again. An average American spends $ 2,000 to $ 4,000 on gas each year. “From the gas standpoint alone, the electric car makes a lot of sense,” Annis says. “Keeping these cars charged isn’t free, but overall the electric car is far cheaper in operating costs.”
Environmentally-friendly. Cars and trucks are responsible for roughly 24 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas pollution, according to Scientific American. With no emissions, electric cars are eco-friendly as they run on electrically powered engines. “The growing popularity of these cars is partly an outgrowth of our global environmental concerns,” Annis says. “You’ll be contributing to a green climate. And some manufacturers will offer incentives through the government for going green.”
Low maintenance. No more oil changes, spark-plug replacements, or the many repair possibilities associated with an internal combustion engine and transmission. The electric car motor has far fewer moving parts. Brakes on electric cars receive less wear and tear. “Expensive engine work is a thing of past,” Annis says.
Quiet. Engines of gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles contribute to noise pollution, which is harmful to health. A study published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) reported that nearly 100 million Americans had annual exposures to traffic noise that were high enough to be harmful. Electric vehicles are extremely quiet.
“The advantages are many,” Annis says. “Technology tailored to a changing consumer base is steadily making improvements in electric cars, and in the next decade the roads will be filled with them.”
About Ted Annis
Ted Annis (www.tedmagnetics.com) is the manager and co-founder of Transducing Energy Devices, LLC, which is engaged in the research and development of a fuel-less electricity energy device. He received a BS in physics and an MBA at Xavier University. He formerly was with Ford Motor Company and was CEO and co-founder of SupplyTech, Inc.
If you’ve successfully avoided HQ Trivia up until now, congratulations on finding an incredibly secure rock to live under.
Let me catch you up real quick. HQ Trivia is an app-based trivia game that streams live twice per day (once a day on weekends). It’s free to play, and players that make it through all 12 questions or so earn a share of the prize money — at least $ 2,000.
Since its launch in August 2017, HQ has been steadily growing its audience. HQ is sometimes likened to Jeopardy! for millennials, though others think that’s giving HQ a bit too much credit while others are convinced that it’s already jumped the shark. But the numbers say otherwise — on March 4, more than 2 million players logged on in an effort to win a cut of $ 50,000 (only 6 players did).
Investment followed. On March 6, Axios reported that the app secured an additional $ 15 million in funding, with venture capital firm Founders Fund leading the investment round (many players then boycotted the app to protest the funding, which came from Peter Thiel, the venture capitalist and founder of PayPal controversial for his support of Donald Trump, homophobia, and possibly harvesting the blood of the young for his own immortality).
Controversy aside, lots of people think HQ is onto something unique. Here’s why the game might be a sign of what’s to come in the world of entertainment.
It Makes the Familiar Feel New
In essence, HQ Trivia isn’t too far removed from a television show like Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? or Jeopardy! What’s new is that just about anybody can participate — and potentially win. The only barrier to entry is access to a smartphone.
HQ Trivia takes advantage of that human instinct to scream at the television when someone gets an obvious question wrong, only now, you can test your wits against other competitors in a setting with stakes.
Even if you don’t win, though, the experience is still fun. HQ Trivia is more interactive that the average televised quiz show, and its usual host, Scott Rogowsky, seems like that know-it-all friend of yours, just trapped in your phone.
It Gets People to Tune in at a Set Time
The popularity of Netflix and its ilk mean you get to watch old reruns of Seinfeld whenever you want, not just when the networks decide. But the same is increasingly true for new shows — there isn’t as much incentive to watch fresh episodes when they first air. That’s why deals for live programming, such as sports events, are more lucrative than ever— because networks can be sure that people will actually tune in. So networks pay big money for these programs, because they can make big money from advertising.
Players have to show up at a certain time to participate in HQ Trivia, and the variability of the jackpots makes it easy for the show’s creators to encourage viewership on specific nights.
It’s Already Popular
HQ Trivia’s 2.1 million players on March 4 might not seem impressive compared to the Oscars’ reported viewership of 32.9 million. Here’s the thing, though: the Oscars celebrated its 90th anniversary this year, whereas HQ Trivia just launched seven months ago.
Now, the question is how the company plans to make money from this popularity. The trivia game still has no ads, though that may soon change.
HQ CEO Rus Yusupov told Axios fans shouldn’t expect typical ads. Instead, advertising will take the form of “native content.” Perhaps they’ll add mentions of advertisers to the host’s script or incorporate branding into the set.
It’s easy to imagine that a major company could sponsor a special episode of the show, providing a huge jackpot in exchange for direct access to all these viewers at once. Perhaps networks could sponsor episodes as well, broadcasting them live on television as a lead-in to other programming in an effort to increase viewership.
Of course, there’s also the possibility of expanding HQ Trivia’s current 15-minute format into a 30- or 60-minute television show itself with a regular time slot. Cyan Banister, a partner at Founders Fund, told Axios that HQ has plans to expand beyond trivia into other kinds of interactive content (what kind is not yet clear). Maybe those programs could fill out the extra time.
Only time will tell if HQ can capitalize on its early success, or if its recent funding will end up doing more harm than good.
How can we train doctors without risking lives? How can we get from point A to point B in our cars without having to look at our phone? How can we see a product halfway around the world without flying there? Augmented Reality. These questions are great indicators for the 3 reasons we will see major growth in Augmented Reality in 2018. The vast array of potential for Augmented Reality in the Medical field, Automotive world, and Marketing realm are seemingly never-ending, but what exactly can happen with Augmented Reality in those industries? Let’s take a look at these 3…
Traditional TV viewership is in decline as people cut the cord and opt for cheaper streaming services like Netflix and Hulu instead. But what about the 90 million U.S. subscribers who still pay around $ 100 a month for traditional pay TV?
Unsurprisingly, the main reason for keeping pay TV is the ability to watch live broadcasts, with 71 percent of TV subscribers noting that as a Top 3 reason to keep pay TV, according to a new survey by Deloitte. Less obvious is that a majority of Americans are holding on to their pay TV subscriptions because it’s bundled with their internet subscription. Some 56 percent consider the bundle a major reason to keep their TV subscription, partly because it makes the overall price seem like a better deal.
Cable and satellite companies often include TV, internet and telephone for a single reduced price. For many, the cost they’d have to pay for internet alone doesn’t seem much less than they would pay for all three services individually, so the perceived value can seem tempting. In turn, the cable companies are able to eke out higher overall monthly fees by throwing in those “extras.”
Interestingly, 70 percent of pay TV subscribers also say they are paying too much for their subscriptions. Couple that statistic with the proliferation of lower-cost “skinny bundles” and broadband options, and the two main reasons for keeping traditional TV — live TV and the internet bundle value — seem less substantial. If you could get live TV for less, why wouldn’t you?
Other reasons for retaining pay TV include DVR, and because people “have had it for so long and don’t want to change.”
Deloitte’s survey was conducted online during November 2017 among 2,088 consumers. It’s weighted to be representative of U.S. consumers.
OLED superseded LCD because it’s brighter, has better color saturation, and is more power-efficient. microLED is expected to replace OLED within the next few years for the same reasons – it improves on all three of those factors.
I don’t believe that Apple’s ‘secret manufacturing facility‘ for microLED screens indicates any desire or plan on Apple’s part to move into large-scale component manufacturing, but I do think it’s a very smart move.
I suspect there are three reasons Apple has established the facility …