Why Apple Is Leading the Way in Mobile Gaming

How Complete Beginners are using an ‘Untapped’ Google Network to create Passive Income ON DEMAND

For years, Apple products garnered a reputation for being relatively unfriendly to gamers. With the rise of the iPhone, that’s no longer true — and Apple might even be at the forefront of modern mobile gaming. Consumer interest in mobile gaming has been steadily rising — that’s a fact reflected at this year’s 2018 Game […]
Read More…
iDrop News
Cash For Apps: Make money with android app

Philips Lighting, Acuity Brands and OSRAM leading IoT for lighting market

How Complete Beginners are using an ‘Untapped’ Google Network to create Passive Income ON DEMAND

Philips Lighting, Acuity Brands, Eaton, and OSRAM are among the leading players in the Internet of Things (IoT) for lighting market, according to a new report from Navigant Research.

The report, which can be found here, assesses 16 vendors in total, including larger vendors, such as Cisco, Intel, Schneider Electric, and Siemens. These players are all placed as challengers, as opposed to contenders or leaders.

Navigant Research argues that the total global market for IoT lighting is set to hit $ 5.5 billion by 2027, up from $ 808.2 million this year.

The research firm defines IoT for lighting as ‘adding value beyond illumination.’ “Connectivity and communication can happen between devices within the lighting system and between lighting devices and non-lighting devices,” it adds. “Within lighting systems, such communication can be accomplished through lighting controls. Networked lighting controls achieve many of the aspects described in this definition of IoT lighting solutions.”

The report assesses a variety of questions, including the drivers pushing ahead the IoT for lighting market, global revenue forecasts, and the strengths and weaknesses of each company.

“The leaders within this report have separated themselves from the competition through a broad solution portfolio, strong partner relationships, and advanced technology development,” said Krystal Maxwell, Navigant research analyst. “Contenders and challengers in this market will need to improve in various ways, from expanding their solution offerings, to increasing sales, to differentiating themselves through unique features and applications.”

In terms of how smart lighting equates to the IoT, a blog post from OSRAM explains the link. “Currently, we are at the infancy stage of what the IoT will enable – today we are seeing just a sliver’s worth of applications from a very big pie of potential applications,” the blog notes. Smart lighting is playing a pivotal role, unlocking the power of the IoT and smart building applications.

“Lighting is ubiquitous throughout all buildings and every luminaire is connected to a source of power,” it adds. “It is the perfect conduit for collecting data on what is happening in the building at any given time.”

You can read the Navigant synopsis here.

iottechnews.com: Latest from the homepage

Cash For Apps: Make money with android app

Zimperium zLabs Team To Release iOS 11.2.2 Vulnerabilities, Potentially Leading To Jailbreak

Here’s an iOS 11.2.2 jailbreak update that brings good news as Zimperium has announced they will make multiple vulnerabilities public that could potentially lead to jailbreak.

[ Continue reading this over at RedmondPie.com ]

Redmond Pie

R Programming is leading the way to technology’s next big thing

R programming and its versatility in statistical operations, model building, and visualizations have made it a foundational tool in expanding artificial intelligence and teaching machines to start thinking for themselves. That makes it a tool with a lot of future applications, so study up and get hired with this Complete Introduction to R Programming Bundle ($ 19 from TNW Deals).
The Next Web

Samsung says it’s still leading India market

Samsung is disputing the Canalys’ conclusion that Xiaomi has overtaken the Korean company in India. Based on data by GfK (a German research firm), Samsung says it has 45% of the value market share and 40% of the volume share. Canalys analyzed shipment numbers, while GfK tracked sales instead. By that measurement, Samsung is still ahead. Samsung claims it doesn’t need to do large shipments because its supply chain is lean and efficient. A Samsung spokesperson added that the company was India’s Most Trusted Brand in 2017, making a quick recovery after the Galaxy Note7 incident pushed…

GSMArena.com – Latest articles

The leading lobbying group for Amazon, Facebook, Google and other tech giants is joining the legal battle to restore net neutrality

The companies will intervene in a coming lawsuit through their trade group, the Internet Association.

A leading lobbying group for Amazon, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Twitter and other tech giants said Friday that it would be joining the coming legal crusade to restore the U.S. government’s net neutrality rules.

The Washington, D.C.-based Internet Association specifically plans to join a lawsuit as an intervening party, aiding the challenge to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s vote in December to repeal regulations that required internet providers like AT&T and Comcast* to treat all web traffic equally, its leader confirmed to Recode.

Technically, the Internet Association isn’t filing its own lawsuit. That task will fall to companies like Etsy, public advocates like Free Press and state attorneys general, all of which plan to contend they are most directly harmed by Pai’s decision, as Recode first reported this week.

As an intervener, though, the Internet Association still will play a crucial role, filing legal arguments in the coming case. And in formally participating, tech giants will have the right to appeal a judge’s decision later if Silicon Valley comes out on the losing end.

“The final version of Chairman Pai’s rule, as expected, dismantles popular net neutrality protections for consumers,” said the group’s chief, Michael Beckerman, in a statement. “This rule defies the will of a bipartisan majority of Americans and fails to preserve a free and open internet.”

“IA intends to act as an intervenor in judicial action against this order and, along with our member companies, will continue our push to restore strong, enforceable net neutrality protections through a legislative solution,” he continued.

For now, net neutrality advocates cannot yet file their lawsuits challenging Pai. That’s because his repeal — the final text of which was released yesterday — still must be published in a government repository known as the Federal Register.

Once that and other administrative steps are complete, then Pai’s opponents can head to the courts, where they are expected to argue that he acted arbitrarily and capriciously — and defied the will of the public — in rolling back net neutrality rules. The safeguards, implemented under former President Barack Obama, treated internet providers similar to utilities, preventing them from blocking or slowing web traffic or prioritizing their own offerings over those from their rivals.

It’s hardly the first time that tech giants have gone to court to defend net neutrality. Before Pai scrapped the U.S. government’s open internet protections in 2017, the likes of AT&T and Verizon sought to strike them down with a court challenge of their own two years earlier. In that battle, the Internet Association filed a friend-of-the-court brief defending the Obama administration.

* Comcast, through its NBCU arm, is an investor in Vox Media, which owns this website.

Recode – All

Didi Chuxing buys control of 99, Brazil’s leading ride-hail app

Didi Chuxing, the ride-sharing giant of China and likely the most valuable startup in the world, just bought a controlling stake in 99, a leading ride-sharing app in Brazil.

According to Reuters (citing a repot in Valor Economico, a leading financial newspaper in Brazil), the deal values 99 at $ 1 billion. Didi already had a minority stake in the startup, having invested $ 100 million over a year ago.

“Globalization is a top strategic priority for Didi,” Cheng Wei, founder and CEO of Didi, said in a statement. “With enhanced investments in AI capabilities and smart transportation solutions, we will continue to advance the transformation of global transportation and automotive…

Continue reading…

The Verge – All Posts

SpaceX Is Leading The Rise Of An Entirely New Industry

Whose Is Bigger?

Private space companies want to send humans where none have gone before. Big-picture thinkers like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Richard Branson are developing spacecraft that can take tourists into orbit around the Earth, to vacation on the Moon, or even to build settlements on Mars.

If you’ve been paying attention to this burgeoning industry (or even if you haven’t), SpaceX is hard to ignore. The high-profile company has completed more missions than any of its competition. Since its first demo flight in 2006, Elon Musk’s brainchild has launched a handful of commercial satellites into orbit and completed 45 missions total, according to the company’s launch manifest. And the company has another 70 missions planned, totaling in $ 10 billion in contracts.

It’s one of the world’s most valuable privately-held companies.

The company’s Falcon 9 rockets are also reusable, dropping the price of each launch by up to 30 percent, or $ 18.6 million per launch, SpaceX’s president estimated last year. Technology still under development, such as the Dragon capsule, the Falcon Heavy rocket, and the BFR rocket system are essential to reaching one of Musk’s most clearly-defined goals for the company: to put humans on Mars. These new technologies will also propel SpaceX even farther forward as the other companies work to reach milestones that they passed long ago.

Some have begun to speculate that the company is doing so well that it’s edging out its competition. Because the industry is so new (and so expensive), could it, or any other company, become a monopoly? Answering these questions — understanding what the future of spaceflight will look like, and who the main players will be — ultimately requires a look at the history and origins of humanity’s journey into space.

The Origins of Private Spaceflight

Since the beginning of the space program, NASA has worked with private companies to bring its projects to fruition and to meet its goals. Even so, federal law prohibited private companies from launching their own satellites until 1984.

The government maintained a strong hold on spaceflight into the new millennium. In 2010, that all changed. President Obama decided to end the space shuttle program and symbolically ended the first era of spaceflight, ushering in a new, privatized space race. In his statement regarding the final launch of the Atlantis Shuttle, Obama said, “Today’s launch may mark the final flight of the Space Shuttle, but it propels us into the next era of our never-ending adventure to push the very frontiers of exploration and discovery in space.”

Suddenly, the U.S. government untethered a huge block of federal funding from NASA, and private companies quickly began to fill the void the historic shuttle program left.

Before 1969, the United States and the Soviet Union faced off on a singular goal: to be the first nation to put a human on the Moon. Today, many more organizations are launching into space, and with a diverse array of goals.

In 2000, Jeff Bezos, the CEO of Amazon, founded spaceflight company Blue Origin, which has focused most of its resources on creating technology capable of ferrying tourists into space. In 2015, Blue Origin became the first private spaceflight company to successfully launch and land a reusable rocket. Blue Origin recently released new photos of its New Shepard passenger capsule and rocket, and the company hopes to carry out its first consumer flights in early 2018.

Billionaire Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic is also dedicated to space tourism. “Our purpose is to become the spaceline for Earth; democratizing access to space for the benefit of life on Earth,” the company’s website states.

Elon Musk is less focused on space tourism (though he does plan to send two paying tourists to orbit the Moon), and more on getting humans to the Moon and to Mars. In September, Musk announced plans for SpaceX’s “BFR” rocket, which he plans to send to Mars. But the same one could also put humans permanently on the Moon.

Speaking at the International Astronautical Congress (IAC) in Adelaide, Australia, Musk said, “It’s 2017. We should have a lunar base by now.” Putting human settlements elsewhere in the solar system could benefit us all, Musk’s logic goes — we could advance economic interests by developing space mining, or decrease the burden of overpopulation on an increasingly-crowded Earth.

Image credit: Blue Origin

Leader or Monopolizer?

Each company may have a slightly different goal and a different way to achieve it, but it’s clear that SpaceX is disrupting the burgeoning private space industry, John Logsdon, founder of the Space Policy Institute and professor emeritus at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University, told Futurism. “SpaceX has been able to offer a standard service that is placing satellites in orbit at a lower price [than its competitors] and with acceptable reliability,” Logsdon said.

But Logsdon doesn’t think the company is a monopoly. “I have no idea what somebody calling it a monopoly means, since there are other providers, both in the United States and overseas, that have launch services. I think it’s an uninformed comment, basically. It [SpaceX] would like to be a monopoly. You would like to be the only provider of services, but it’s far from that position, and I don’t think they ever will achieve it.”

The key to Logsdon’s assessment ultimately depends on understanding the sheer size of the space industry and the excessive rate at which it is expanding.

The petty squabbling of billionaires looking to one-up each other is just the side-show to the main event: the advent of reusable spacecraft. All of these tests on individual rockets allow the scientific minds behind the scenes to work out the kinks that will eventually bring us the true next generation of space travel, one in which spacecraft are reusable, cheap, and available to anyone.

Of course, these innovations will provide benefits beyond simple space tourism and will assist many other avenues of business. In fact, they already are. Reducing the cost of launching satellites makes it more accessible to small companies with limited resources that might be looking to explore space, do scientific testing, or launch their own communications networks.

Finnish observation satellite company ICEYE is one such organization preparing to launch a global network of Earth-monitoring microsatellites. To do that, the company is using rockets made by others. “With small satellites, you tend to do what’s called a rideshare, meaning that there is a rocket that is then shared by a large primary payload. This is really a way that a lot small private space companies are able to access space with non-governmental budgets,” Pekka Laurila, CFO and co-founder of ICEYE, told Futurism.

Financial costs aren’t the only thing Laurila considers before such a launch, however — reliability and time all add up, he said. And because the company may want to launch satellites into a less-trafficked area of Earth’s orbit, that ridesharing may be more challenging. And though it may be leading the race, SpaceX might not be the right fit for companies like ICEYE because it offers such large-scale services; smaller launch companies that are able to learn from SpaceX’s successes and failures can fill in the gaps. “In these type of situations, we would definitely be looking toward working with a small launch provider like Vector Space Systems, for example,” Laurila said.

Image credit: SpaceX

Put in this light, Logsdon’s statements make sense. SpaceX may be a massive force in the world of space exploration, but given the diverse array of needs across industries, it is unlikely that they will ever be the only contender in the race.

Of course, that’s not to discount SpaceX’s contributions. “Lowering the price of access to space is certainly an important development, and SpaceX has led the way in doing that,” Logsdon said. But organizations that prioritize other forms of affordability and accessibility will likely have their share in the fray.

Whether technological innovations are spurred by competition or collaboration, all of humanity will reap the benefits from the enhanced understanding and capability that space travel will undoubtedly bring us. SpaceX may not be monopolizing the landscape, but it is setting a standard against which its competitors, small and large, must measure themselves.

We’re not witnessing another space race, we’re enjoying the rise of a new industry, one in which there are many winners emboldened by the success of giants.

The post SpaceX Is Leading The Rise Of An Entirely New Industry appeared first on Futurism.