Governments are starting to use new information channels in decision support and policymaking – and some of those new information sources are constituents of the IoT.
Traditionally, governments decide on policy and exercise their power in a ‘top down’ model. The extent to which they reflect the will of the people varies tremendously, of course, and they may be subject to influence from lobbyists, think tanks and advisors, but in essence, governments tend to govern from on high.
Where connecting with the people is seen as desirable, however, policymakers have explored a variety of methods for gathering opinions and gauging public sentiment – and increasingly, information streams from people, animals and objects are part of an Internet of Governmental Things.
Examples of this can be seen all over the world. Take, for example, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), where a February 2016 white paper, Edge of Government, spelled out the potential of the IoT in public decision-making.
“New mechanisms for government [help] to gather and respond to the aspirations and ideas of the masses,” it reads. “In allowing for mass input, new platforms for collective intelligence also provide for targeting of narrowly defined groups in ways that have not been previously possible.”
For example, the report continues, a local government may want to solicit ideas on community redevelopment from as many of the residents of a particular neighbourhood as possible, but only from residents of that neighbourhood. “Collective intelligence is the tool that enables this combination of mass participation and precision targeting,” it says.
This suggests an embrace of smart city technologies, where sensors and monitoring devices create the data to validate the perceptions, observations and sentiments of residents about a particular locale, creating a greater level of certainty for government bodies. But this may just the tip of the iceberg.
Read more: Progress: How can government get IoT right?
Internet of garbage vultures
In Peru, the government is currently running a program that we might call the Internet of Garbage Vultures (IoGB), fitting GPS-enabled mobile GoPro cameras to vultures, so that these scavenging birds can be used in the fight to identify and eradicate illegal dumping of waste.
According to a report on ABC News Australia, “Ten trained vultures wearing purpose-designed vests have already started to monitor the city from above with the help of tracking technology as part of the Vultures Detect program, and have been carefully trained to return to their keepers.”
This trend is growing. The central north African country of Chad has developed a similar initiative and fitted dogs with IoT sensors to track down diseases and the United Kingdom has begun a program to use pigeons to monitor air pollution.
But you don’t just switch on collective intelligence overnight. Whether data comes from from humans or from IoT initiatives, engineering information streams so that they can be woven into the operational fabric of government is a big challenge.
In a January 2016 Nesta white paper, Governing with Collective Intelligence, authors Tom Saunders and Geoff Mulgan point out that adopting collective intelligence is not always easy. “Many governments resist openness and citizen input of any kind. Sometimes this is out of a sense that governments know best,” they write.”More often, it is because political organizations created many years ago lack the mechanisms to easily request, absorb, analyze and act upon ideas and information offered by citizens, external organizations [and other external sources].”
To overcome these challenges, the public sector needs a clear strategy to make use of the collective intelligence not just of citizens but also sensors, meters, devices – and, indeed, vultures dogs and pigeons.
The post Governments to tap IoT for ‘collective intelligence’ appeared first on Internet of Business.
“Bitcoin ought to be outlawed.” Those were the ominous words of economist Joseph Stiglitz in an interview with Bloomberg last week. He’s not the first to say it and he certainly won’t be the last. In its short lifetime, Bitcoin managed to survive against all odds It kept grinding through the collapse of Mt Gox. It outlasted critics and doubters who declared it dead again and again and again. It outwitted an exchange and ICO ban from China. It hasn’t suffered a major security breach, even as it moves billions of dollars around the world in the blink of an eye, something almost no major company or government’s website can…
As Sarah Perez at TechCrunch notes, Apple has quietly changed the wording on its App Store guidelines regarding “apps created from a commercialized template.” That’s a super boring way to refer to a problem that Apple has been trying to solve since at least June of this year: cookie-cutter apps. These are the sorts of apps that a small business or local event might have a service create and submit to the App Store for them — they’re often low quality, undifferentiated, and poorly maintained. And so back in June, Apple just straight up banned them.
But today, Apple is softening that stance a little. The new language adds a bunch of caveats after the word “rejected,” including rules that will allow templatized apps if they’re “submitted…
Plus, Waze wasn’t the best co-pilot for commuters maneuvering through the LA wildfires, Al Franken resigns, and the coolest holiday gift guide.
Filipino president Rodrigo Duterte used Facebook — used by 97 percent of Filipino internet users — to spread his message before weaponizing it to target dissent. Since his election in May 2016, Duterte has created an often-vicious army of Facebook personalities and bloggers worldwide, who are methodically taking down opponents, including a prominent senator and human-rights activist. [Lauren Etter / Bloomberg]
Chinese authorities are monitoring WeChat and other mobile messaging apps to monitor the internet-using populace. Empowered by new digital surveillance tools, China appears to be reverting to old form, investigating and punishing citizens for imprudent online comments. [Eva Dou / The Wall Street Journal]
Southern California continues to battle a renewed onslaught of at least six wildfires menacing greater Los Angeles and Ventura County. On Thursday, officials sent an emergency alert warning of “extreme fire danger,” the state’s largest use of a warning system installed by Congress in 2012. LAPD and firefighters have asked the driving public not to use navigation apps like Waze because they were occasionally steering some drivers toward the flames. [The New York Times]
Democratic senator Al Franken announced yesterday that he would resign from the Senate, making him the highest-profile casualty in the growing list of lawmakers felled by charges of sexual harassment or indiscretions. Meanwhile, a Boston social marketing executive is the sixth woman to accuse Shervin Pishevar of sexual misconduct, and the first to do so on the record. On Tuesday, Pishevar took a leave of absence from his venture capital firm, Sherpa, and from several boards. [The New York Times]
YouTube plans to launch its own paid streaming music and video service in March. Internally called Remix, the service is the third attempt by parent company Alphabet to catch up with rivals Spotify and Apple, which have spurred a recovery in the music business after almost two decades of decline. Warner Music Group has already signed on; Sony Music Entertainment and Universal Music Group are in talks. [Lucas Shaw / Bloomberg]
San Francisco is cracking down on R2D2-style robots that deliver takeout food or packages. The delivery robots are still in early test phases; on Tuesday, city supervisors unanimously passed regulations that will limit companies to three robots each; limit the city to nine robots total; and confine robots to industrial areas where almost no one lives. And they can’t go faster than 3 mph and must have a human monitor, the new law says. [San Francisco Chronicle]
Top stories from Recode
Kara Swisher hand-picks the people and trends that might have made the Recode 100 if they weren’t quite so awful.
Democratic lawmakers want the company to offer more information about the data it’s collecting, and why.
The trial is set for March 19.
Jessica Rosenworcel, a member of the FCC, defends the endangered regulatory policy on the latest episode of Too Embarrassed to Ask.