Apple talks gender pay gap in the U.K., says men are paid more than women in the country

How Complete Beginners are using an ‘Untapped’ Google Network to create Passive Income ON DEMAND

Apple is pretty vocal about its stance on equality, often noting that everyone that works for Apple deserves equal pay, regardless of race or gender.

more…

9to5Mac

Cash For Apps: Make money with android app

Microsoft faces 238 complaints of gender discrimination

How Complete Beginners are using an ‘Untapped’ Google Network to create Passive Income ON DEMAND

Microsoft has been accused of 238 cases of gender discrimination or sexual harassment by female employees working in US-based technical jobs, according to court filings made available this week. The complaints were made between 2010 and 2016, and inc…
Engadget RSS Feed
Cash For Apps: Make money with android app

AI reveals even more about Hollywood gender bias

How Complete Beginners are using an ‘Untapped’ Google Network to create Passive Income ON DEMAND

Here's what we know about how women are portrayed in Hollywood cinema: Male characters speak far more often than female ones. Men talk more about achievement, whereas women tend towards positive and emotional language. The majority of best picture wi…
Engadget RSS Feed
Cash For Apps: Make money with android app

Women in AI & IoT: Why it’s vital to Re•Work the gender balance

The third Re•Work Women in AI dinner covered algorithmic fairness, advanced image recognition, and the challenges and opportunities of machine learning in wearables. Joanna Goodman, a regular IT correspondent for The Guardian, was there for Internet of Business and explains why such events are so important for our industry.

Re•Work’s third Women in AI dinner was held in London on 20 February. This regular networking event celebrates women in artificial intelligence and showcases their achievements. But although the speakers are women, these are not women-only events. This is important, because diversity is about inclusivity, not segregation.

There are not enough women working in tech, let alone in AI. In the UK, for example, 83 percent of people working in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) careers are men, according to figures presented at UK Robotics Week 2017. Anecdotally, it has been reported that less than ten per cent of coders are women, despite Ada Lovelace being widely considered to be the first computer programmer. (For more on these issues, see Internet of Business says at the foot of this article.)

Re•Work is attempting to improve the gender balance in the burgeoning AI community by organising a series of dinners that feature female expert speakers who talk about their work at the cutting edge of emerging technology.

Attendees are from tech giants, corporates, start-ups, and academic research institutions. Last week’s event was sponsored by Royal Bank of Canada and Borealis AI, RBC’s Institute for Research, which blends academic research into machine learning with practical applications.

Speakers were selected to reflect key themes in AI. Re•Work founder Nikita Johnson [watch her presentation video below] and her team are careful not to dwell on traditional ‘women’s challenges’. Instead, Re•Work is focusing sharply on technology and research, showcasing women in AI in a way that overrides traditional preconceptions.

However, the challenge is that bias and preconception are deeply ingrained in society, which means they are also ingrained in the data that AI applications work with. Accordingly, the first presentation by Silvia Chiappa, senior research scientist at DeepMind, was about innovating towards algorithmic fairness. But why is this important?

Curing the bias virus

Machine learning is already used to make and support decisions or processes that affect people’s lives: in hiring, education, lending, and in policing and law, where judges and parole officers use algorithms to predict the likelihood that a defendant or prisoner will reoffend.

It is therefore critical to ensure that the algorithms are not biased toward or against individuals from particular social or racial groups, as has been found to be the case with the COMPAS system in the US, which has exhibited a bias against black Americans.

The big challenge is that it is impossible take the bias out of historical/precedent data (which reflects preconceptions that existed in society at the time), so DeepMind is innovating ways to increase algorithmic fairness.

In AI terms, it is ineffective to disregard sensitive factors like race or gender, or give them a negative weighting, because this can have a negative impact on system performance. And it may not increase fairness because these factors are correlated with other attributes. For example, there is commonly a positive correlation between race and neighbourhood.

This underlines the importance of contextualising problems: identifying conscious and unconscious bias and looking for solutions. In other words, we can’t eliminate biases, but we can use them to work towards a fairer society, said Chiappa.

The second presentation came from Cecilia Mascolo, professor of mobile systems at the University of Cambridge and The Alan Turing Institute.  Her talk covered potential applications for built-in computational units on smartphones and wearables, particularly in developing countries that may have limited or slow access to cloud platforms.

These include using the smartphone’s built-in AI capabilities to support healthcare applications, such as the use of voice recognition for mood monitoring and early diagnosis – for example, of Alzheimer’s disease.

However, constant monitoring, and/or the collection of detailed location data, have privacy implications. These are analogous to the side effects of a drug, suggested Mascolo, who added that more localised computations could reduce privacy concerns while maintaining the benefits of personalised healthcare monitoring.

Self-diagnosis in wind turbines

The third and final presentation was from Fujitsu’s lead deal architect, Marian Nicholson, who discussed the application of deep learning in advanced image recognition. Examples include teaching wind turbines to recognise a defective blade.

Photos: Jenny Donoghue

Fujitsu’s work starts from the premise that humans are predominantly visual conceptualisers – i.e. babies recognise images and relate them to what’s happening around them. Today, image recognition is particularly important for autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles, delivery drones, and so on.

Nicholson referred to recent headlines about the dangers of AI and highlighted the need for organisations to choose to use technology for good. Fujitsu’s own mission is to build technology that will benefit society, she said.

Read more: Prevent malicious use of AI, say Oxford, Cambridge, Yale

But for society to accept AI demands transparency about the data, how the system works, and – critically – why it was designed, along with the ability to identify and minimise bias. The power and potential of AI are balanced by our responsibility to ensure that it is used in a safe and fair way, she said.

The speeches and the roundtable discussions demonstrate the value of the work being undertaken by women in AI and the importance of encouraging more women to work in this space.

• Last week, I also attended Professor Alan Winfield’s lecture, AI Futures: The Societal Impact of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence, at the Ismaili Centre in London. Professor Winfield has increased the percentage of women in his own team at the Bristol Robotics Lab from zero to 40 percent. He said that the secret of his success in increasing gender diversity is to take on more senior women. Others will then follow.

The next Women in AI dinner in London will be on 11 July 2018.

• Joanna Goodman is a freelance journalist who writes about business and technology for national publications, including The Guardian newspaper and the Law Society Gazette, where she is IT columnist. Her book Robots in Law: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming Legal Services was published in 2016.

Internet of Business says

We should acknowledge that although there is an appalling gender imbalance in technology careers, a growing number of senior industry figures are women, including IBM CEO Virginia Rometty, who has presided over IBM’s refocusing on cognitive services, HPE CEO Meg Whitman, and many more.

In the UK, along with the experts mentioned in Joanna’s article, prominent women include Dr Joanna Bryson, Associate Professor in the Department of Computing at the University of Bath, Lucy Martin, head of robotics at the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Prof Dr Kerstin Dautenhahn, Research Professor of Artificial Intelligence in the School of Computer Science at the University of Hertfordshire, and Dr Sue Black, OBE, who has done so much excellent work on stressing the importance of women in IT.

Yet these and other world-leading women in their fields are in a tiny minority. The figures speak for themselves: technology, coding, AI, engineering, and science, are overwhelmingly dominated by men: male voices, male panelists at industry conferences, and so on. Meanwhile, only one country in the world – Rwanda – has 50 percent or more female representation in parliament. These are among the challenges that women face.

At school, girls need more positive role models – and for women to have a more prominent platform – in order for them to want to pursue STEM careers when they leave school.

While diversity is about inclusion, not segregation, the risk of this imbalance is very real, particularly in AI research, because these technologies need to reflect all of human society and not simply produce facsimiles of centuries-old social problems.

The more that these technologies are developed in closed groups of (usually white) males, the more unconscious bias is likely to be reproduced in systems, including in so-called black-box solutions. At last year’s World Economic Forum in Davos, Joichi Ito, head of MIT’s Media Lab, made these observations of his own (male) students, whom he described as “oddballs”.

Internet of Business strongly supports the work of Re•Work and other organisations to redress the balance, by focusing on expertise and insight, and leading by positive example.

The post Women in AI & IoT: Why it’s vital to Re•Work the gender balance appeared first on Internet of Business.

Internet of Business

AI facial analysis demonstrates both racial and gender bias

Researchers from MIT and Stanford University found that that three different facial analysis programs demonstrate both gender and skin color biases. The full article will be presented at the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency la…
Engadget RSS Feed

The Tech Industry’s Gender Problem Isn’t Just Hurting Women

Outnumbered and Outranked

While Tesla’s Elon Musk, Apple’s Tim Cook, and other CEOs can confirm that it’s lonely at the top, for women in business — particularly in the tech industry — the climate anywhere along the corporate ladder can be downright hostile.

Not only are women often outnumbered by men in the workplace, they are also treated differently than their male colleagues on both a professional and personal level, and it’s causing problems throughout all segments of society.

“We have made no progress! We have made absolutely no progress.”

In “The Secret Life of CEOs,” Freakonomics Radio’s new six-week podcast series exploring CEOs and leadership, host Stephen J. Dubner interviewed a number of high-profile CEOs, including Carol Bartz (Yahoo!) and Ellen Pao (Reddit), and their responses reveal a lot about what life is like for women at all levels of the notoriously male-centric tech industry.

During her interview with Dubner, Bartz voiced her disappointment at the current state of affairs for women at the U.S.’s biggest corporations.

“Have you noticed that there’s less females in the Fortune 500 now than there were?” she asked. “I mean, we have made no progress! We have made absolutely no progress.”

While Bartz didn’t clarify whether she meant females simply working at Fortune 500 companies or at the helm of them, women have made some progress in the latter category. However, they still lag far behind their male counterparts in terms of representation.

In 2017, 32 of the companies on the annual Fortune 500 list had female CEOs. In 2016, that figure was 21 (down from 24 the year prior), so last year was a step forward. However, 32 still accounts for just 6.4 percent of companies, so women continue to be significantly outnumbered by men at the CEO position.

This lack of balance extends to board seats as well. According to a study by Deloitte and The Alliance for Board Diversity, the number of women holding board seats on Fortune 500 companies increased from 856 in 2010 to 1,100 in 2016. However, that new figure still only represents 20.2 percent of the total number of seats.

In the tech industry, the numbers aren’t any better as you descend the corporate ladder.

In 2016, an Anita Borg Institute survey of 60 of the largest companies in the U.S. found that women held roughly 21 percent of technical jobs, such as those in hardware, software, and information services. The representation dropped steadily as you ascended the corporate ladder: 26.8 percent for entry level jobs, 22.6 percent for mid level, 18.4 percent for senior level, and 14.1 percent for executive level.

Unfair and Offensive

The struggle for women doesn’t end once they break into the male-dominated worlds of business and tech, either.

Shortly after Bartz graduated with her bachelors degree in computer science in 1971, she went to work at 3M as the only woman professional in her division. According to her biography on The Balance, she told More Magazine in 2006 that she faced discrimination at that company and quit in 1976 after being told women don’t do the jobs she wanted to pursue.

In her interview with Freakonomics Radio, Bartz noted how she was disappointed that the climate for women hadn’t gotten better by the time her daughter was in the same position.

“I was so hopeful that my daughter would go to college and be with open-minded young men. They’d all work together in school, and when they got out, they’d all realize that they were equally smart, and, you know, off we’d go and things would change,” said Bartz.

“It’s exactly the opposite. They got out, the guys got these jobs, they got a little money, and they turned into old frat boys in business.”

While the issue of business being a “boys club” extends across industries, Silicon Valley appears particularly entrenched in this frat boy culture. Ellen Pao has firsthand knowledge of the damage this environment — and speaking out against it — can do to a female professional’s career and reputation.

Years prior to her eight-month-long stint as CEO of Reddit, Pao worked at the Silicon Valley venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins. While there, she saw female junior partners continually hit the glass ceiling, getting passed over for promotions in favor of their less-experienced male counterparts. She also found herself the target of harassment by a male colleague she briefly dated.

In 2012, after it had become clear to Pao the company wasn’t going to address her complaints of gender discrimination and harassment, she filed a $ 16 million lawsuit against the firm. Five months after the initial filing, Pao was fired, and in 2015, she lost the lawsuit, during which she was accused of everything from having “sharp elbows” to not being “a team player.”

A third of women in tech have feared for their personal safety because of work-related circumstances.

Unfortunately, Pao’s experience of gender discrimination and harassment in the tech industry isn’t an anomaly.

In 2015, 210 senior-level women working in the tech industry participated in The Elephant in the Valley, a survey exploring the topic of gender in Silicon Valley. Each woman had at least 10 years of work experience, some at start-ups and others at large companies, such as Apple and Google, and their responses revealed the pervasiveness of Silicon Valley’s gender problem.

Of the women surveyed, 87 percent reported demeaning comments from male colleagues, 47 percent said they’d been asked to do lower-level tasks that male colleagues weren’t asked to do, and 66 percent said they had been excluded from important social or networking events.

A staggering 90 percent of surveyed women said they’d witnessed sexist behavior at company offsites or industry conferences. Sixty percent claimed to have been on the receiving end of unwanted sexual advances, and of those women, 65 percent said the advances came from a work superior. One in three said she’d feared for her personal safety because of work-related circumstances.

Hurting Us All

A number of well-meaning initiatives designed to encourage young girls to pursue careers in technology may seem like a step in the right direction. However, all the Girls Who Code and hEr VOLUTION programs in the world can’t help if women don’t stick with tech long-term.

Given all the issues they currently face in the tech industry — the glass ceiling, the exclusionary culture, the sexual harassment — it’s not surprising that 41 percent of the women who do enter the tech field decide to leave it (for comparison, only 17 percent of men make the same decision).

This exacerbates the gender imbalance in the tech industry, which is hurting everyone: women, the companies not hiring women, and even society at large.

Tech jobs tend to pay well, and while a number of industries are dying off, the tech sector is expected to add jobs in the coming years. Encouraging more women to pursue jobs in tech could help close the wage gap and address the higher rates of poverty amongst women than men. It could also ensure those important jobs aren’t left unfilled, which would stifle technological innovation.

Research has shown that companies with high gender diversity are more profitable and less volatile those with low gender diversity, and companies with at least one woman on their board of directors have also been documented outperforming those without any women by 26 percent.

“We are effectively leaving out half of our population by excluding women from the innovation economy.”

Gender diversity also leads to more innovation, which is an essential part of the technology industry. A 2014 study of research and development teams from 4,277 companies in Spain found a positive relationship between gender diversity and radical innovation.

“Gender diversity can provide different perspectives and insights. The combination of these offers a wider range of ideas and, thus, greater creativity, facilitating decision-making processes,” said lead researcher, Cristina Díaz García, in a press release.

Vivek Wadhwa, a Distinguished Fellow at Carnegie Mellon University’s College of Engineering and author of Innovating Women: The Changing Face of Technology, confirmed the importance of gender diversity for innovation.

“We are effectively leaving out half of our population by excluding women from the innovation economy,” he told Futurism. “Given where technology is headed, with technologies advancing exponentially and converging, the skills needed to solve the larger problems require a broad understanding of different fields and disciplines. Most of all, we need the empathy to design good solutions. Women excel in both of these.”

The exclusion of women during the development stages can affect the product that eventually makes its way to the public. Tech companies may not intend to design smartphones that are too large for women’s hands, health apps that ignore menstruation, and virtual assistants that can’t answer questions asked more often by women than men, but those are the products the currently male-centric tech industry is developing.

The implications of these oversights are terrifying when you consider the likelihood that we’ll soon be using technology to enhance our biology, a point addressed by Judith Spitz, a former Verizon CIO of 10 years and Founding Program Director of the WiTNY Initiative.

“We are hurtling towards a time when our biology will be equal parts technology and physiology. Think about the implications for the human race if the technology that is destined to be the essence of who we are as a species is developed largely under the leadership and guidance of a single gender,” said Spitz during talk at the 2016 Propelify Innovation Festival.

Change Comes From the Top

At first glance, the problems of women in the tech industry may seem worse now than when Pao lost her lawsuit. However, the post-Pao years have actually been an empowering time for women in tech.

Soon after the trial, Silicon Valley attorneys told Fortune they noticed an increase in the number of women coming forward with complaints of gender discrimination. Women’s willingness to speak out about behavior that they may have previously ignored or just “dealt with” has become known as the “Pao effect,” and it seems to be getting stronger as time goes on.

In 2017 alone, Google, Uber, Twitter, and a number of other major tech companies were all involved in highly publicized scandals involving discrimination or sexual harassment. Add in 2017’s #MeToo movement, and the spotlight on Silicon Valley’s frat boy culture has never been brighter than it is right now.

“The problems with sexual harassment are too real. So far, the tech industry has been a boys club modeled after Wall Street. Now, with all of the negative press, we have seen what lies beneath, and we cannot continue to tolerate this,” said Vivek Wadhwa.

“It’s up to the CEO to say, ‘No, we need to get rid of this person.’”

Women are starting to speak out about harassment and gender discrimination, and the media is reporting on it, but that’s not enough. Sixty percent of the Elephant in the Valley survey respondents who spoke out about sexual harassment in their workplaces said they were not satisfied by the resolution to their reports. When Ellen Pao approached her superiors with her claims of harassment, they suggested she transfer to the China office.

The tech industry’s gender problem is hurting us all, but the industry itself needs to be the one to fix it. As Pao told Dubner during her Freakonomics Radio interview, it’s up to the people at the top of the corporate ladder — be they men or women — to protect all levels of employees from harassment from coworkers, even if doing so causes a setback for the company.

“It’s up to the CEO to say, ‘No, we need to get rid of this person. We’re going to move the ship date out. We’re going to disappoint some customers. But it is important enough to the company, and to me, that I need to make this call’,” she told Dubner.

Of course, having more women in those position of power will also help, according to Shivaram Rajgopal, the vice dean of research at Columbia Business School.

“Women in leadership positions serve as a significant deterrent against a permissive culture towards sexual harassment,” he told The Christian Science Monitor. “You rarely hear of such issues at Yahoo! where Marissa Mayer was the CEO… [Facebook’s Mark] Zuckerberg has [chief operating officer] Sheryl Sandberg to temper the frat-boy culture.”

There’s a reason “The Secret Life of CEOs” is a six-episode series — the role these men and women fill in the business ecosystem in both complex and extremely important. With the tech industry in the midst of a cultural crisis, it’s up to its leaders to make it clear they will no longer stand for the status quo when it comes to the treatment of women.

By setting an example for those climbing the corporate ladder behind them, they can ensure that the tech industry of tomorrow is one that treats everyone with the same level of respect.

The post The Tech Industry’s Gender Problem Isn’t Just Hurting Women appeared first on Futurism.

Futurism