AT&T approves Altair Semiconductor’s ALT1210 LTE-M chipset for its network

Altair Semiconductor’s ALT1210 LTE-M chipset has been approved by AT&T to run on its IoT network, the company has announced.

The move ‘furthers Altair’s commitment to AT&T and broadens the device and module partner ecosystem supporting LTE-M deployments’, the company added.

The chipset has multiple use cases, including in powering trackers, wearable devices, and sensors. It also offers minimal power consumption, and is software upgradeable to single antenna LTE CAT-1.

“LTE-M is essential to carriers’ cellular IoT strategies,” said Eran Eshed, Altair VP worldwide sales and marketing. “Being able to offer pre-certified chipsets and modules will significantly help vendors bring products to market quickly and cost effectively.

“Our LTE-M collaboration with AT&T extends the existing and strategic CAT-1 engagement.”

AT&T launched a pilot of its LTE-M network in San Francisco late last year. As this publication reported at the time, Altair was named, alongside other companies including Ericsson, Qualcomm Technologies and Sierra Wireless, as partners in the pilot. In February, AT&T said it was ahead of schedule in the LTE-M network’s deployment.

“LTE-M has the potential to connect more devices and applications than anything before,” added Cameron Coursey, vice president of Internet of Things solutions at AT&T. “When you introduce a new technology like LTE-M, it’s very important to bring together an ecosystem of network provides, module providers and chipset providers.

“Having Altair’s ALT1210 LTE-M chipset certified on AT&T’s network will help accelerate the promise of LTE-M,” Coursey added.

As Coursey posited in a ReadWrite article last month, the key aspects for businesses to consider when choosing an IoT network are around coverage, mobility, battery life – for the device side – and cost. “Building a successful IoT solution is all about matching your connectivity needs to the right technology or mix of technologies,” said Coursey. “Whether you choose one network technology or take a multi-network approach, you want the best blend of coverage, performance, and value.” Latest from the homepage

The Trump administration is suing AT&T to stop its purchase of Time Warner

The Justice Department said the deal as proposed would spell “higher prices for consumers and less innovation for millions of Americans.”

The U.S. government announced on Monday that it plans to sue AT&T in a bid to stop the wireless giant from proceeding with its proposed $ 85 billion purchase of content powerhouse Time Warner.

In response, AT&T redoubled its commitment to the deal, pledging to fight the Justice Department in a court case that could span months or more — and hinge at least in part on President Donald Trump’s public opposition to the two companies’ plans.

In the eyes of the DOJ, the merger — one of the largest “in American history,” an agency official told reporters — would result in “higher prices for consumers and less innovation for millions of Americans.”

Specifically, DOJ said it had no choice but to sue because it believes AT&T would “use its control over Time Warner’s popular and valuable networks to hinder its rivals by forcing them to pay hundreds of millions of dollars more per year for the right to distribute those networks,” the official explained. That includes Time Warner-owned properties like HBO, TBS, TNT and CNN, the latter of which Trump has criticized.

For its part, AT&T sharply rejected the U.S. government’s claims.

“Fortunately, the Department of Justice doesn’t have the final say in this matter,” said David R. McAtee II, the company’s general counsel, in a statement. “Rather, it bears the burden of proving to the U.S. District Court that the transaction violates the law. We are confident that the Court will reject the Government’s claims and permit this merger under longstanding legal precedent.”

AT&T initially envisioned the Time Warner merger, announced in October 2016, as a critical way to expand its reach into consumers’ lives at a time when wireless revenues are declining.

As proposed, the deal would have married AT&T’s 100 million cable and wireless subscribers and Time Warner’s valuable content brands, like HBO and CNN, hoping to further solidify its place in consumers’ living rooms and smartphones.

Quickly, though, anti-consolidation consumer groups, including Free Press, sided with some of AT&T’s soon-to-be content competitors, like Starz, to rail against the deal. They feared the combined company would have too great a reach — and too much market power. Some specifically expressed fears AT&T would withhold popular HBO programming or charge high, arguably unfair prices for others to carry it.

Nevertheless, AT&T and Time Warner initially told investors they expected the deal to close quickly — particularly because it was in the hands of what they believed to be a merger-friendly, Republican-dominated Washington, D.C.

Even the U.S. government’s leading antitrust enforcer — Makan Delrahim, a competition lawyer who arrived at the DOJ this summer — at first expressed an openness to the merger. Months before he was nominated to his post, he said he didn’t believe AT&T’s plans for Time Warner posed any major antitrust concerns.

After arriving at the Justice Department, however, Delrahim began to scrutinize the $ 85 billion deal more aggressively. And many sources described a tense meeting between DOJ officials and AT&T executives in early November. There, DOJ aides appeared to issue the companies an ultimatum: That they would challenge the merger in court unless AT&T sold Time Warner’s Turner unit, which owns CNN, or divest from its current ownership of DirecTV.

Yet looming large over the merger — and now, the court battle — is Trump.

Dating back to the 2016 campaign, he publicly blasted the companies’ merger plans in no small part because he is a vocal critic of CNN, which is part of Time Warner’s Turner TV unit. At one point, sources suggested that Trump could use AT&T’s merger with Time Warner as leverage in pursuit of better coverage by CNN.

The Justice Department, however, has stressed in recent weeks that it has proceeded with its investigation independent of White House interference. The DOJ repeated that again Monday. And Trump, for his part, said the same earlier in November, at one point contending he “didn’t make that decision” to challenge the deal — or seek the sale of CNN.

Meanwhile, the DOJ declined Monday to specify the nature of its conversations with AT&T — and what, exactly, it wanted the combining companies to do in order to win its approval.

“Suffice it to say, we gave it a very good faith effort to try to resolve the harm the government was able to find and still allow for portions, significant portions I will add, of this vertical merger to go forward,” a DOJ official said.

Still, the aide said that he was “really glad that Randall Stephenson” — the CEO of AT&T — “publicly stated, and explicitly said, nobody at the division has ever demanded the sale of CNN.” (Of course, Stephenson’s comments, from a conference in New York City earlier this month, did not address a demand that AT&T sell CNN’s parent, Turner.)

In many ways, the DOJ lawsuit is a rarity: Typically, the U.S. government looks more favorably when companies in different industries seek to combine. Deals like AT&T’s proposed purchase of Time Warner are called vertical mergers because they don’t wipe an existing competitor out of the marketplace.

Instead, the U.S. government’s opposition appears to center on a belief that legal settlements that pave the way for a merger — yet include lengthy rules policing the behavior of two companies — tend not to work. At one point, the DOJ stressed on its call Monday these so-called behavioral remedies had failed to address the feds’ concerns following Comcast’s purchase of NBC Universal in 2011.

“That approach is fundamentally regulatory, imposing ongoing government oversight on what should preferably be a free market,” Delrahim said during a speech earlier this month.

Recode – All

DOJ slaps AT&T with antitrust lawsuit over Time Warner purchase

The US Justice Department has filed an antitrust lawsuit against AT&T to block the massive communications company from purchasing Time Warner, one of the world's biggest entertainment conglomerates. AT&T released a statement calling the move…
Engadget RSS Feed

A former AT&T employee is changing the way engineers find work online

There are a few decisions that truly redefined my life and the way I see things. Starting to work remotely was one of those. More and more people and companies are embracing remote work. Technology has enabled us to manage small to large teams online without having to meet everyone in a physical office. Technology has also enabled us to find more work online and today there are tons of options for where people can find remote or freelance work online. Recently I got the chance to talk a little bit with the creator of FieldEngineer, a platform that enables…

This story continues at The Next Web

Or just read more coverage about: AT&T
The Next Web

Justice Department sues to block AT&T takeover of Time Warner, report says

Article Image

AT&T’s $ 85.4 billion bid to acquisition Time Warner is in jeopardy as reports on Monday claim the U.S. Department of Justice is set to file a lawsuit aimed at blocking the high-profile merger.
AppleInsider – Frontpage News